CSU Extension Home Agriculture at Colorado State University Extension
Putting Knowledge to Work Colorado State University Extension
4-H/YouthAgricultureFamily ConsumerHorticultureNatural ResourcesNutrition ResourcesCounty OfficesHome

Cull or Buy Feed? Partial Budgeting May Hold the Answer

Green Line
by by Jeffrey Tranel,
CSU Extension agricultural and business management specialist

Q. My pastures are almost gone due to the drought conditions. Is it more financial feasible to buy hay for my 120 cows or to sell them?

A. As drought conditions continue, livestock producers must make some critical decisions related to their breeding herds. Should they move their cattle to wherever there is available pasture? Should they buy hay (or other supplemental feed)? Should they sell cows? If I sell my cows this year, will I be able to find pairs to buy next year?

There is no single answer for any of the questions. Each manager must evaluate his/her individual situation and make "best guesses" as to issues like will it rain this fall and what will the price of calves be next fall.

One way to compare the financial feasibility of the alternatives is by using "partial budgeting." Partial budgeting is based on the principle that changes made in the business will have one or more of the following effects: 1) reduce costs; 2) increase income; 3) increase costs; and 4) reduce income. The net effect will be the sum of positive economic effects (reduced costs and increased income) minus the sum of the negative economic effects (increased costs and reduced income).

Option 1. Buy additional hay to feed 120 cows for 4 months. Hay is available and can be delivered for $80 per ton. Since this is otherwise a slow time, labor also is available.
Reduced Costs $ Increased Costs $
Pasture - Owned 0 167 tons hay 13,248
Subtotal 0 Subtotal 13,248
Increased Income $ Reduced Income $
None 0 None 0
Subtotal 0 Subtotal 0
Total Positive Impact 0 Total Negative Impact 13,248
Net Effect = negative $13,248 or negative $110.40 per cow
 
Option 2. Sell 120 cows and buyback pairs next spring
Reduced Costs $ Increased Costs $
Pasture - Owned 0 Marketing - 72,000@3% 2,160
Hay* 29,808 Trucking - 500 miles 1,000
Salt/Mineral - 70 pounds 1,260 Buyback Pairs 120@750 90,000
Other Expenses 6,000    
Subtotal 37,068 Subtotal 93,160
Increased Income $ Reduced Income $
120 Cows Sold @ 600 72,000 None 0
Interest - 72,000@7.5%@270 days 4,050    
Subtotal 76,050 Subtotal 0
Total Positive Impact 113,118 Total Negative Impact 93,160
Net Effect = positive $19,958 or positive $166.31 per cow
*Assumes purchased hay. If hay was home-grown and could be sold, value would go under "Increased Income" instead of "Reduced Costs." However, it is a positive impact in either case.

In addion to answering financial questions, a rancher must think about the genetics of the cow herd – are they irreplaceable or would this be a good time to really upgrade the breeding? Will there be cow-calf pairs available at a reasonable price next spring? Could the rancher use a little break from feeding cows all winter?

At right is an example of how partial budgeting can be used to help a livestock producer make the most informed decision. Assume that a ranch is running out of grass due to drought conditions. There is enough stored feed at the home place to keep the calves until the normal selling time. The rancher wants to look at two options, although there are several others to consider. Each livestock producer must answer all the questions given his or her individual circumstances.

Information on handling taxes on income from unusual livestock sales can be found here. More information on partial budgeting can be found here, along with a handy form.

Go to top of this page.

Updated Tuesday, September 25, 2007.

AnswerLink | Employment | Other Links | Publications | Staff Resources | Site Search
CSU Home | RamPoint | About Us | Calendar | Staff Directory | Webmaster
Disclaimer | Equal Opportunity | Non-Discrimination Statement