Quick Facts...
- Solar-powered pumping systems (SPPS) have been utilized in the United
States for over 20 years.
- As photovoltaic (PV) modules become more affordable and the energy
efficiency of both the modules and solar-powered pumps increases, SPPS
will become a leading technology in remote areas.
- SPPS have proven successful in livestock watering applications throughout
the U.S.
- There are some problems involved with SPPS that can be avoided with
feasibility analysis and proper installation.
Solar-powered groundwater pumping systems are often considered for use in livestock and other remote watering applications instead of other forms of alternative energy because they are durable, can be mobile, and exhibit long-term economic benefits. Generally, alternative power is only considered when the cost of tapping into the closest public power grid far outweighs the costs of using alternative power. There are several technology alternatives for supplying power, or lift, to groundwater systems including: wind turbines, windmills, generators, and solar arrays. The driving factors for selecting the appropriate technology are regional feasibility, water demand, system efficiencies, and initial and long-term costs. Other factors often include the need for power and water reserves in the form of batteries and livestock tanks.
Feasibility
The selection of solar-powered pumping systems (SPPS) should only follow
a thorough look at the feasibility and future prospect of the technology.
There are several important steps in this process. Not all of them can
be covered here, but the key considerations are mentioned below.
Power Source
The first step is to rule out other sources of power or pumping devices.
If the public power grid is reliable and in proximity to the site, preferably
less than 1/3 mile, then solar power would be a poor choice. The cost
of implementing a SPPS can be significantly more than the expense of connecting
to the local power grid. The most expensive element of a livestock solar-powered
pumping system is usually the photovoltaic modules or panels. Table 1
summarizes the pros and cons associated with different sources of alternative
energy for groundwater pumps.
| Table 1. Pros and cons of alternative
forms of energy for pumps. |
|
Pros |
Cons |
| Generator |
Moderate initial cost
Easy to install |
High maintenance, expertise required for repair
Short life expectancy (5 years)
Fuel is usually expensive
Long term (10-20 years) annual costs to operate higher than
SPSS |
| Wind Turbine |
Lower initial costs than SPSS
Long life expectancy
Effective at windy sites (avg. wind speed at least 7 mph)
Clean
No fuel needed |
High maintenance needs
Expensive repair
Parts difficult to find
Wind can vary seasonally and daily
Lower output in calmer winds |
| Solar-powered Pumping System (SPSS) |
Easy to install
Can be mounted on trailer to
accommodate moving livestock
Reliable long life expectancy (20+ years)
Low maintenance, simple repair if related to solar array
Clean
No fuel needed
Modular system can be closely matched to needs, power easily
adaptable to changing demands |
Solar energy can vary seasonally
Higher initial cost
Lower output in cloudy weather |
| From: Solar Pumping Systems
(SPS) Introductory and Feasibility Guide, Green Empowerment. |
Expectations and Costs
The average daily water consumption for a cow/calf pair in Colorado during
the summer is approximately 20 gallons per day. A typical solar-powered
system might serve 50 cow/calf pairs. This is a total of 1,000 gallons
needed per day. The cost of a system that serves 50 cow/calf pairs can
easily reach $11,325. (See Table 4.)
Most economical SPPS will not provide enough water and pressure for the
required demand of community indoor plumbing. However, a SPPS is sufficient
to meet the indoor plumbing needs of a small building or a remote cabin.
Site Location
The site location plays a major part in the feasibility of a SPPS. Peak
sunlight hours (PSH) differ slightly across Colorado. The general rule
is that the less PSH available, the more expensive the required photovoltaic
(PV) array and pump. System costs increase when more storage is needed
to compensate for the limited exposure of the PV array to peak sunlight
hours. Most of Colorado has a PSH of between 4.5 and 5. Another factor
is the climate of the region. Solar-powered systems are not typically
designed for extremely cold weather (temperature less than minus 20 degrees
C or minus 4 degrees F). However, the systems can be insulated to handle
colder temperatures.
The following website shows a PSH map of yearly low peak sunlight hours:
www.solar4power.com/map2-global-solar-power.html
System Security
Another important aspect to consider is security. The PV array is one
of the most expensive components of the system and it should be protected
from theft, vandalism, and livestock. It is strongly recommended that
provisions be made to put a small fence around the array. The fence needs
to have enough set-back that it does not cast a shadow on the array.
Sustainability of System
The long-term costs and ability of the SPPS to adapt to changing demands
should be implemented into the feasibility of the system. Photovoltaic
modules should last 20 to 25 years. This depends on it being maintained
(kept clean and securely mounted) and protected from strong winds, lightning
and hail storms, and falling objects such as tree branches. The solar
pumps should last about 10 years. The other electronics and controls should
be designed to last at least 10 years with little electrical maintenance.
The overall lifetime of the complete system should be designed and maintained
to last 25 years taking into account future demands of the livestock tank.
Inspect the system at least once per week checking the pumping rate, operation
of controller, condition of PV modules, tanks, wires, and pipes (for leaks/corrosion).
SPPS Components
A solar-powered pumping system has the following minimum components:
- water well
- PV array
- array mounting bracket and rack
- pump controller
- electrical ground for controller
- DC pump with safety ropes, mount, and well seal
- wiring
- discharge tubing or piping
- storage tank
- tank flotation switch
- water taps or access points
- security
The pump should be specifically designed for solar power. It is strongly
recommended to purchase the pump controller from the same manufacturer
as the pump. Using another manufacturer could cause several unforeseen
problems and even invalidate the pumps warranty. If the pump does
not contain a built-in check valve, one should be installed to keep the
water from flowing back into the well. Very few pumps can handle reverse
flow without reducing the life expectancy of the pump. Pumps that are
designed to drain during non-operation are meant for extremely cold conditions
to keep water from freezing in the lines. The pump should be set no deeper
than 2 feet above the bottom of the well to help prevent heavy silt and
sand from entering the pumps intake and causing it to seize. The
storage tank should be sized to hold at least three days worth of water
demand to account for evenings and cloudy days. If the controller is not
attached to the array mounting bracket it can be placed in a secure shed
or pump house, preferably water tight and dust free.
 |
| Figure 1. Schematic diagram of a typical SPSS. (Source: Solar
Photovoltaic Water Pumping for Remote Locations, University
of Wyoming, 2006.) |
Well
When installing a new well, it is recommended to contact a licensed water
well contractor. If the well is not properly developed prior to installing
the solar powered pump it can reduce the life expectancy of the pump.
If you are retrofitting a windmill pumping system, the well should be
redeveloped before installing a solar powered pump. The goal of redeveloping
the well should be to remove biofouling from the sidewalls and sediments
from the bottom of the well.
Pump
Pumps designed specifically for solar power utilize direct current (DC)
and tend to be very efficient, but they usually cost more than a comparably
sized alternating current (AC) pump. Surface mounted pumps can be used
for a SPPS but are discouraged because of their limitations when used
in deep wells. Based on the specifications from several manufactures,
the typical lift abilities for surface pumps designed for solar power
are between 10 and 20 feet. Surface pumps also have greater exposure to
the climate making them more vulnerable to freezing weather.
Several of the more common submersible solar-powered pump manufacturers
are listed in Table 2. This table also indicates general operating parameters
for selecting a pump. If using this table, pay particular attention to
the footnotes.
The size of the pump will depend on several factors including: available
water supply, available power, available storage, total dynamic head (TDH),
diameter of well, and water need. Assume that the pump will only be operating
during peak sunlight hours. Try to install the most efficient and simplest
system that meets the project demands.
It is important to determine the total dynamic head. For a SPPS, total
dynamic head can be referred to as the head pressure required to overcome
the sum of the static lift of the water, the static height of the livestock
tank, and the frictional losses in the pipe network. Use the following
calculation to determine the TDH of the pump needed:
TDH = (depth from static water table to top of well + drawdown at sustainable
or desired pumping rate + elevation difference from top of well to top
of storage tank) x 1.1 (The desired pumping rate should not be greater
than the sustained well yield.)
An estimate of the required flow rate of the pump can be determined by
the following equation:
 |
| PSH = Peak sunlight hours |
The next step is to take the well diameter, TDH, and desired flow rate
and refer to Table 2, or other manufacturers not listed, to determine
what type of pump will fulfill the system needs.
| Table 2. Manufacturers of submersible solar-powered
pumps. |
| Brand |
Model/Series |
Diameter (inches) |
Power Requirements/
Ranges
|
Max Lift (feet) |
Max Capacity (gpm) |
Websites |
| Voltage Range (volts) |
Power (watts) |
Max.
Current
(amps) |
| Divwatt |
Solastar-3B |
Con-D |
34-85 DC |
1200 |
12 |
656 |
6.0 |
www.divwatt.co.za |
| |
| Fluixnos |
Solaflux |
3.9 |
20-70 DC |
20-300 |
~4 |
492 |
4.2 |
www.fluxinos.it |
| |
| Lorentz |
PS150, PS1800 |
3.8/3.9 |
12-50 DC |
450/1400 |
~12.5 |
39-197 |
21.7-72.0 |
www.lorentzpumps.com |
| PS200, PS600, PS1200 |
3.9 |
24-48 DC |
1200 |
Con-D |
165-760 |
10-45 |
| |
| Grundfos |
16SQF-10, 25SQF-3, 25SQF-6 |
3.9 |
30-300 DC or 90-240 AC |
1400 |
Con-D |
50-100 |
25-75 |
www.grundfos.com |
| 40SQF-3, 40SQF-5, 60SQF-3, 75SQF-3 |
| |
| Grundfos |
3SQF-2, 3SQF-3, 6SQF-2, 11SQF-2 |
2.9 |
30-300 DC or 90-240 AC |
900 |
Con-D |
325-525 |
3.0-11 |
www.grundfos.com |
| |
| Kyocera |
SD-Series |
3.8-4.6 |
12-30 DC |
20-140 |
10 |
100-230 |
2.4-4.5 |
www.kyocerasolar.com |
| SC-Series 500 and 1000 |
3.8 |
60-120 DC |
140-1000 |
14 |
98.4 - 525 |
3.7-43 |
| |
| Solarjack |
SDS Series - no longer made |
3.8-4 |
12-24 DC |
Con-D |
Con-D |
Con-D |
Con-D |
www.goldengenesis.com |
| SDS Series - no longer made |
~4 |
30-180 DC |
140-2880 |
Con-D |
800 |
50.0 |
| |
| Shurflo |
9300 |
3.8 |
24 DC |
155 |
4.6 |
230 |
2.0 |
www.shurflo.com |
| |
| Sun Pumps |
SDS-Series |
3.8-4.5 |
12-30 DC |
95-184 |
6 |
115-230 |
1.3-5.0 |
www.sumpumps.com |
| SCS-Series (1/2 to 2 HP motors) |
3.9-4.0 |
30-180 DC |
320-2070 |
7.1 - 11.5 |
30-65 |
4.0-70 |
| |
| NAPS |
SP-Series 400 and 1500 |
Con-D |
2 45-90 DC |
150-1600 |
Con-D |
43-656 |
0.64-30.1 |
www.napssystems.com |
| NOTES: Not all manufacturers of solar powered
pumps are listed. Where possible from Internet resources, all listed
specifications are from manufacturers and not the distributors. The
operational ranges for most of the pumps listed were based on tests
performed with 6kWh/m 2/day of solar irradiance. Lorentz pump specifications
were between 5.2 and 7.0 kWh/m 2/day. Actual flow rate depends on
perfect sunlight hours at installation site. The listed wattage is
based on the performance ranges of the pump, but because of inefficiencies
in solar energy conversion it is recommended that the solar modules
be sized with a factor of at least 1.25 X the pump demands. Manufacturers
only have distributors in certain regions of the world. Before deciding
on a solar powered pump make sure your region is served, or it is
economical to ship the pump there. |
PV Array & Photovoltaic Cells
Solar power comes from photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert the suns
energy into usable DC electricity. A module consists of PV cells and an
array consists of several modules. PV cells are primarily made from silicon
and come in three different types: monocrystalline, polycrystalline (multicrystalline),
and amorphous. Figure 2 shows the three types of PV configurations.
 |
| Figure 2. Types of PV modules.(Source: Guide to Solar-Powered Water
Pumping Systems in New York State. New York State Energy Research
and Development Authority.) |
The efficiency of the PV module relates to the area of active cells exposed
to the sunlight. Monocrystalline are the most efficient, converting approximately
15 percent of the suns energy to electricity, but they are also
the most expensive of the three. Photovoltaic modules have typical warranties
of 20 to 25 years, with life expectancies approaching 30 years. Table
3 compares the differences between the three main types of PV cells.
A factor of 1.25 times the pump wattage requirements is often used to
determine the preliminary size of the required array. This accounts for
the energy losses in the modules and controller. If batteries and a regulator
are added into the system, the PV array demand will be higher. The PV
array needs to be mounted securely to a tilted rack that is fixed to the
ground. If the modules are fixed, the orientation of the tilt is to the
south and should be equal to the site latitude. If they are on an adjustable
mount, the tilt should be the latitude minus 10 to 15 degrees in the summer
and the latitude plus 10 to 15 degrees in the winter.
| Table 3. Types of PV cells and their efficiency. |
| Type of Cell |
Efficiency Range
|
Comments |
| Monocrystalline |
14 to 16% |
Highest price, affected by temperature |
| Polycrystalline |
12 to 14% |
Medium price, affected by temperature |
| Amorphous Silicon |
8 to 9% |
Medium to low price, not affected by temperature |
| Source: Research Institute for Sustainable Energy, Murdoch,
Western Australia |
Pump Controller
The pump controller is a highly specialized item and can vary significantly
between manufacturers. A technical term for a pump controller is a linear
current booster. The purpose of the pump controller is to regulate
and match the flow of DC electricity to the needs of the pump. The pump
controller contains the recognition components for the storage tank flotation
switch and the low-well switch. The controller should last approximately
10 years.
Additional Components
There can be several additional components to a SPPS that will enhance
the performance of the system or add backup energy reserves.
1. Tank: If a new livestock tank is being built for the system,
it is recommended to design it with a volume sufficient for three days
worth of average demand. This is primarily to compensate for nights and
cloudy days, especially when other power backup systems are not used.
Make sure the internal velocities and pressures are appropriate for the
pipe material and desired flow rates.
2. Trailer Mounting: A significant advantage of using a solar
powered pumping system for livestock watering applications is it can be
mobile. The PV array can be mounted on a trailer and set up on-site with
the appropriate tilt for the panels. Due to how rough ranch roads tend
to be, it is strongly recommended that the PV array be taken off of the
rack and secured between layers of high-grade protective padding to keep
them from being damaged during transit. If a quality solar-powered pump
is purchased it can also be pulled from the old well and secured at the
new location along with the PV array. A properly designed mobile system
can provide a substantial cost savings when cattle are moved several times
a year to areas in proximity of an accessible well and livestock tank.
3. Batteries: Deep-cycle batteries are often used as a power backup.
They are recharged during the day through the PV array and drained at
night or during cloudy days. Batteries should be lead-acid so they can
be trickle charged indefinitely once they reach full charge. The pump
controller is usually installed after the batteries. The addition of batteries
requires a charge regulator between the batteries and the PV array. The
charge regulator needs to monitor the battery voltage to prevent over-charging
because the DC solar energy fluctuates throughout the day. It is also
recommended to install blocking diodes before the charge regulator. A
diode in the system should prevent the PV array from draining the batteries
in low light conditions. If adequate water storage is available the batteries
are not necessary.
4. Wind Turbine: Wind turbines can be a very cost effective backup
to solar power in areas with average wind speeds above 7 mph. Usually
wind turbines are low maintenance and tend to perform best during the
winter and spring.
5. Generator: If sufficient water storage is not available, some
systems may need a backup generator to run the pump during low sunlight
periods. If a generator is used with a DC pump, an inverter is usually
required. However, generators are directly compatible with some pumps
like the Grundfos SQ Flex pumps. Grundfos recommends an interface controller
when using a generator to automatically switch back to solar power when
it is available (See Table 2).
6. Solar Tracking System: A solar tracking device can be added
to the PV array to increase the power yield. Tracking systems are often
sold by the manufacturers of PV modules. Trackers are attached to the
mounting bracket and control the degree to which the array is tilted towards
the sun. They can either be controlled passively (suns heat exposure)
or electronically through part of the converted energy from the PV array.
Passive trackers contain liquid (often Freon) that when heated from the
sun moves from one cylinder to another causing the rack to tilt more into
the sun. Tracking devices have been reported to increase the daily energy
yield up to 40 percent at certain latitudes. They can also add approximately
25 percent of additional maintenance costs.
7. Weather Insulation: Weather proofing and insulation should
be added for extremely harsh environments, especially in areas where temperatures
reach minus 20 degrees C (minus 4 degrees F).
8. Low Well Switch: In low yield wells, where the drawdown of
the well exceeds the pumping capacity, the addition of a shutoff switch
is needed to keep the pump from running dry. Some pumps advertise they
can run dry without damage to the pump, but allowing any pump to continually
run dry is a bad idea. Ideally, the pump should shut off when the water
level gets within 2 feet of the pumps intake to reduce air intake
and turbulence. Some pumps come pre-installed with a safety shut-off switch.
9. Sand Shroud: A sand shroud may be needed around the intake
zone of the pump. Sand shrouds are recommended for use in wells that have
high sediment loads or that were not properly installed. They are particularly
recommended in open boreholes which are not screened through the saturated
zone of the well. The pump manufacturer can usually provide a compatible
sand shroud.
Example SPPS Sizing Calculation
The following example is given based on a Grundfos 6 SQF-2 helical rotor
pump and an average sized system for livestock applications. General costs
and multiplier values are preliminary estimates taken from the Green Empowerment
Feasibility Guide. The listed cost of the pump and controller is a conservative
price based on the suggested retail price and the price taken from various
online distributors of Grundfos pumps:
Assuming no reserve battery systems and 3 days worth of demand water
storage, the SPPS is designed for up to 50 cow/calf pairs at a TDH of
90 feet. The site is located in northeastern Colorado with 4.75 hours
a day of peak sunlight.
Calculate estimate of demand: 50 cow/calf pairs x 20 gpd/pair = 1,000
gpd
Calculate preliminary estimate for required flow rate:
Using Table 2, a Grundfos 6 SQF-2 pump curve matches the flow and head
parameters well. At 90 feet of TDH and 3.5 gpm, the pump needs 160 watts
of power being delivered directly to the pump. The efficiency losses of
energy in the PV modules and other electronics require an array capable
of producing approximately 200W or 1.25X the pump requirement. A cost
of $6/W for PV module energy output is used which is about the mid cost
reported. The pump curve for a Grundfos 6 SQF-2 is shown in Table 4. The
total estimated cost of this system is approximately $11,325. Other assumptions
and details are also shown in Table 4.
| Table 4. Estimated cost for 1,000 gal/day SPPS. |
| Item |
Amt |
Cost/Amount* (U.S. $) |
Cost
(U.S. $) |
| TDH (ft.) |
90 |
|
|
| Pumping Rate (gpm) |
3.5 |
|
|
| Pump DC Demand (W) |
160 |
|
|
| Peak Sunlight Hours |
4.8 |
|
|
| Required PV Array (W) |
200 |
$6
|
$1,200 |
| Fixed Mount w/Rack (per module) assuming each module
100W |
2 |
$75 |
$150 |
| Grundfos 6 SQF-2 Helical Rotor Pump |
1 |
$1,500 |
$1,500 |
| Grundfos CU 200 Pump Controller |
1 |
$300 |
$300 |
| Pump Shut-off Switches & Misc. |
1 |
$500 |
$500 |
| Wiring (ft.) |
100 |
$1.50 |
$150 |
| Piping (ft.) |
120 |
$1.25
|
$150 |
| Installation of SPPS (not including well or storage
tank) |
1 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
| Well (ft.) |
75 |
$25 |
$1,875 |
| Storage Tank for 3 days demand (gal) |
3000 |
$1.50 |
$4,500 |
|
Total cost
|
|
$11,325 |
| *costs verified September 2007. |
For More Information
- Sinton C.W., Butler R., Winnett R. Guide to Solar-Powered Water Pumping
Systems in New York State. New York State Energy Research and Development
Authority (NYSERDA). [On-line], available at: (www.nyserda.org/publications/solarpumpingguide.pdf),
retrieved in March 2007.
- Practical Action. technical brief release. Solar (Photovoltaic) Water
Pumping.
- Intermediate Technology Development Group Ltd. Patron HRH. [On-line]
available at: (www.practicalaction.org),
retrieved in March 2007.
- Research Institute for Sustainable Energy (rise). Solar Water Pumping
Module 2. [On-line], available at: (www.rise.org.au/info/Education/SPS/swp002.html),
retrieved March 2007.
- Grundfos Pumps. Technical Specifications for SQFlex series pumps,
[On-line] available at (www.grundfos.com),
retrieved in March 2007.
- Meah K. et al. Solar photovoltaic water pumping for remote locations.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 2006:1-16.
|