Quick Facts...
- Estimating the amount of fuel used in farming operations will help select the best conservation
practices for farm equipment.
- Tractors use an average of only 55 to 60 percent of their maximum horsepower on a year-round
basis.
- Energy-use rates for farming operations frequently are measured in horsepower hours.
- Select the most fuel-conserving method by comparing different tillage methods and cropping
systems.
With increasing concern for fuel conservation and energy management, farmers may wish
to estimate the amount of fuel required to perform specific farming operations. By knowing the
amount of fuel used, farmers can select the best conservation practices to manage farm
equipment.
Type of Fuel
There are three common types of fuels used in farm tractors: diesel fuel, gasoline and LP
gas. Their respective physical characteristics are:
| Diesel fuel | 7.0 lb/gal* | 138,000 Btu/gal* |
| Gasoline | 6.2 lb/gal | 124,300 Btu/gal |
| LP gas | 4.25 lb/gal | 92,300 Btu/gal |
The present trend is toward larger tractors and diesel engines. The diesel engine is more
efficient and powers nearly all new tractors over 100 horsepower (hp).
Estimating Fuel Requirements
Tractors -- even the larger, high-horsepower units -- use an average of only 55 to 60
percent of their maximum horsepower on a year-round basis.
The average horsepower use is less than the maximum power rating mainly because a
tractor is selected to do high-power requirement operations, such as heavy tillage, in a timely
manner, and usually has excess power for seedbed finishing, seeding and cultivating. Only a few
crop production operations require maximum power. Fuel consumption is shown in Table 1.
| Table 1: Average rates of fuel consumption for year-round operation of three fuel-type
tractors. |
| Engine fuel type |
Average fuel consumption per rated PTO-hp |
| Diesel fuel |
0.048 gal/hr |
| Gasoline |
0.068 gal/hr |
| LP gas |
0.080 gal/hr |
Fuel Requirements for Crop Production
To disk a field, the gallons of fuel per acre for that field are nearly constant regardless of
the size disk and tractor used. For the same operation, differences due to equipment are quite
small. Therefore, the fuel used per acre for any specific operation can be assumed to be constant
except for small variations due to soil types, moisture content and depth of operation.
Energy-use rates for farming operations frequently are measured in horsepower hours (hp-hrs). A tractor-disk combination with an average 100 hp at the drawbar for five hours delivers
500 hp-hrs of energy for the disking operation. Since it is not practical for farmers to measure
drawbar horsepower, energy requirements normally are based on rated maximum power takeoff
horsepower (PTO-hp). Diesel tractors deliver an average of 13.0
PTO-hp-hrs/gal; gasoline, 9.0 hp-hrs/gal; and LP gas, 7.5 hp-hrs/gal.
Example: A diesel tractor rated at 100
maximum PTO-hp operating at full load uses
7.69 gal/hr: 100 hp / 13.0 hp-hrs/gal = 7.69
gal/hr. On the same basis, a 100 hp gasoline
tractor uses 100 / 9.0 or 11.1 gal/hr, and an LP
gas tractor, 100 / 7.5 or 13.3 gal/hr.
Agricultural engineers from several states
have compiled average values for power
requirements and fuel used per acre for specific
farming tasks as shown in Table 2. These figures assume typical
conditions and average working depths and may be used to make
fuel estimates for the indicated operations. If a higher-than-average
fuel requirement is indicated because of some local condition, such
as heavy soil, increase the table values by 25 percent. Reductions of
as much as 25 percent may be made for light energy requirement
situations. There are exceptions to the plus-or-minus 25-percent
correction, such as the application of chemicals where the variation
is nearer plus or minus 10 percent.
| Table 2: Average energy-use rates and fuel requirements for farming tasks. |
| Operation |
Energy-use rate, PTO hp-hrs/acre |
Gallons per acre |
| Gasoline |
Diesel |
LP gas |
| Shred stalks |
10.5 |
1.00 |
0.72 |
1.20 |
| Plow 8 inches deep |
24.4 |
2.35 |
1.68 |
2.82 |
| Heavy offset disk |
13.8 |
1.33 |
0.95 |
1.60 |
| Chisel plow |
16.0 |
1.54 |
1.10 |
1.85 |
| Tandem disk, stalks |
6.0 |
0.63 |
0.45 |
0.76 |
| Tandem disk, chiseled |
7.2 |
0.77 |
0.55 |
0.92 |
| Tandem disk, plowed |
9.4 |
0.91 |
0.65 |
1.09 |
| Field cultivate |
8.0 |
0.84 |
0.60 |
1.01 |
| Spring-tooth harrow |
5.2 |
0.56 |
0.40 |
0.67 |
| Spike-tooth harrow |
3.4 |
0.42 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
| Mulch treader |
4.0 |
0.42 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
| Rod weeder |
4.0 |
0.42 |
0.30 |
0.50 |
| Sweep plow |
8.7 |
0.84 |
0.60 |
1.01 |
| Cultivate row Crops |
6.0 |
0.63 |
0.45 |
0.76 |
| Rolling cultivator |
3.9 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
| Rotary hoe |
2.8 |
0.35 |
0.25 |
0.42 |
| Anhydrous applicator |
9.4 |
0.91 |
0.65 |
1.09 |
| Planting row Crops |
6.7 |
0.70 |
0.50 |
0.84 |
| No-till planter |
3.9 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
| Till plant (with sweep) |
4.5 |
0.56 |
0.40 |
0.67 |
| Grain drill |
4.7 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
| Combine, small grains |
11.0 |
1.40 |
1.00 |
1.68 |
| Combine, beans |
12.0 |
1.54 |
1.10 |
1.85 |
| Combine, corn and grain sorghum |
17.6 |
2.24 |
1.60 |
2.69 |
| Corn picker |
12.6 |
1.61 |
1.15 |
1.93 |
| Mower (cutterbar) |
3.5 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
| Mower conditioner |
7.2 |
0.84 |
0.60 |
1.01 |
| Swather |
6.6 |
0.77 |
0.55 |
0.92 |
| Rake, single |
2.5 |
0.35 |
0.25 |
0.42 |
| Rake, tandem |
1.5 |
0.21 |
0.15 |
0.25 |
| Baler |
5.0 |
0.63 |
0.45 |
0.76 |
| Stack wagon |
6.0 |
0.70 |
0.50 |
0.84 |
| Sprayer |
1.0 |
0.14 |
0.10 |
0.17 |
| Rotary mower |
9.6 |
1.12 |
0.80 |
1.34 |
| Haul small grains |
6.0 |
0.84 |
0.60 |
1.01 |
| Grain drying |
84.0 |
8.40 |
6.0 |
10.08 |
| Forage harvester, green forage |
12.4 |
1.33 |
0.95 |
1.60 |
| Forage harvester, haylage |
16.3 |
1.75 |
1.25 |
2.10 |
| Forage harvester, corn silage |
46.7 |
5.04 |
3.60 |
6.05 |
| Forage blower, green forage |
4.6 |
0.49 |
0.35 |
0.59 |
| Forage blower, haylage |
8.3 |
0.35 |
0.25 |
0.42 |
| Forage blower, corn silage |
18.2 |
1.96 |
1.40 |
2.35 |
| Forage blower, high-moisture ear corn |
5.9 |
0.63 |
0.45 |
0.76 |
The best way to adapt these figures to your own situation is
to run periodic checks. Carefully measure the amount of fuel used
for specific operations over a short time, such as two or three days.
By using the field acreage and amount of fuel
consumed, you can check your average against
the figures in the table.
Compare Different Tillage Methods
The table also can be used to compare
fuel requirements for different tillage methods or
for different cropping systems. Such comparisons
become more and more important with increasing
emphasis on fuel conservation. For example,
suppose you want to compare diesel fuel
requirements for two different tillage systems for
wheat production. Assume average conditions
and compare a moldboard plow system with a
stubble mulch system as shown in Table 3. The
comparison reveals that the stubble mulch system
saves 0.88 gallons of diesel fuel per acre over the
moldboard system.
| Table 3: Fuel requirement comparison of moldboard plow vs. stubble mulch system for
wheat production. |
| Operation |
Diesel fuel, gal/acre* |
| Moldboard plow |
Stubble mulch |
| Disk |
0.45 |
0.45 |
| Plow |
1.68 |
-- |
| Sweep |
-- |
0.60 |
| Mulch treader |
-- |
0.30 |
| Sweep (twice) |
-- |
1.20 |
| Disk (twice) |
1.30 |
-- |
| Field cultivation |
0.60 |
0.60 |
| Drill |
0.35 |
0.35 |
| Combine |
1.00 |
1.00 |
| *To convert to metrics, use the following conversions: 1 gallon = 3.8 liters, 1 acre = .4 hectare. |
The figures in this fact sheet are averages based on available
research data. A farmer could make a reasonable estimate by using
these figures, but should maintain personal records and make spot
checks to refine the accuracy of the figures to individual farming
systems and conditions.
References
- Agricultural Engineering Yearbook. American Society of
Agricultural Engineers, 2950 Niles Road, St. Joseph, Mich.
- Estimating Farming Fuel Requirements. Wendell Bowers
and Myron Paine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla.
- Nebraska Tractor Test Reports, Department of Agricultural
Engineering, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb.
|